Tourism’s Carbon Footprint Soars: Why Travel is Becoming a Climate Crisis

Tourism’s Carbon Footprint Soars: Why Travel is Becoming a Climate Crisis


LUCKNOW: Tourism has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years, as destinations around the world grapple with the environmental and social impacts of large visitor numbers. Cities such as Venice and Rome have introduced new fees to manage crowds, while countries like New Zealand have raised visitor levies in response to the strain tourism places on local resources. A recent study published in Nature Communications sheds new light on one of the biggest concerns surrounding travel: its substantial carbon footprint.


Conducted by researchers led by Ya-Yen Sun at the University of Queensland, Australia, the study found that between 2009 and 2020, global tourism-related carbon emissions grew at an alarming average rate of 3.5% per year—double the growth rate of emissions overall. By 2019, tourism was responsible for 5.2 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide emissions, nearly 9% of the global total. Aviation was the single largest contributor, accounting for 52% of direct emissions, while indirect emissions—such as those from energy used in accommodations—made up another 34%.


Despite various sustainability initiatives, the tourism industry has struggled to decouple its growth from rising emissions. Compared to the global economy, which has made significant strides in improving efficiency, the tourism sector’s carbon intensity remains high. In 2019, tourism’s emissions per dollar spent were 30% higher than the global economic average and four times greater than the broader services sector. This underscores the industry’s continued reliance on fossil fuels, despite numerous pledges to reduce its environmental impact.


The Role of Aviation and Consumer Behaviour


One of the biggest challenges in making tourism more sustainable is the aviation industry. Airlines have long been a major contributor to carbon emissions, and regulatory efforts to reduce their impact have often been weak or ineffective. While many carriers have introduced measures such as carbon offset programs and limited use of sustainable aviation fuel, these efforts have largely fallen short of making a meaningful dent in overall emissions. Stronger policies and incentives for airlines to adopt cleaner technologies are essential if tourism’s environmental footprint is to be reduced.


Tourists themselves also play a role in driving up emissions. Many travelers engage in more carbon-intensive activities while on vacation than they do at home, including frequent dining out, shopping, and visiting multiple attractions in a short period. This higher level of consumption increases the carbon footprint of tourism beyond just flights and accommodations, making it difficult for policymakers to account for and manage emissions effectively.


Unequal Distribution of Tourism’s Carbon Footprint


The study also highlights the uneven distribution of tourism-related emissions across the world. Just 20 countries were responsible for three-quarters of the total tourism carbon footprint, with wealthier nations generating far higher per capita emissions than poorer ones. The United States, China, and India accounted for the bulk of emissions growth, driven largely by domestic travel. This finding suggests that while international tourism often receives the most attention, domestic travel within large economies is also a significant source of carbon emissions.


In wealthier nations, outbound tourism contributes significantly to emissions. Frequent long-haul flights, luxury accommodations, and energy-intensive leisure activities—such as cruise tourism—exacerbate the problem. Meanwhile, developing countries with emerging middle-class populations are seeing a surge in travel demand, further adding to global tourism emissions.


The Response from Destinations


Many popular tourist destinations have begun implementing measures to curb visitor numbers and reduce their environmental impact. Venice, a city that has long struggled with over-tourism, has introduced a €5 ($5.30) fee for day-trippers and has placed limits on the size of tour groups to ease congestion in its historic center. Similarly, Rome is considering charging a €2 fee for visitors to the Trevi Fountain as part of broader efforts to manage tourism’s impact on public spaces.


Beyond Europe, other destinations are taking steps to address the environmental challenges posed by tourism. New Zealand has increased visitor fees to fund conservation efforts and mitigate the strain on its natural landscapes. In Southeast Asia, popular sites such as Thailand’s Maya Bay and the Philippines’ Boracay Island have been periodically closed to allow ecosystems to recover from excessive tourism.


While these measures are a step in the right direction, experts argue that more comprehensive strategies are needed to manage tourism’s carbon footprint effectively. In addition to regulating visitor numbers, governments should focus on decarbonising energy grids and investing in cleaner transportation options to reduce the sector’s reliance on fossil fuels.


The Path to Sustainable Tourism


One of the most effective ways to make tourism more sustainable is through a faster transition to renewable energy. Many tourism-related activities, from hotel operations to local transportation, rely on electricity and fuel that could be sourced from cleaner alternatives. Investing in green infrastructure—such as solar-powered resorts, electric public transport, and energy-efficient buildings—can help reduce the emissions associated with tourism.


In addition, greater transparency and accountability are needed when it comes to measuring tourism’s carbon footprint. Many countries do not accurately account for the full range of emissions generated by visitors, making it difficult to develop effective policies. Establishing more rigorous reporting standards and setting limits on tourism emissions could encourage both businesses and travelers to make more sustainable choices.


Governments also have a role to play in shaping consumer behaviour. Encouraging slower, more sustainable travel—such as train journeys instead of short-haul flights—can significantly reduce emissions. Some European countries, including France and Germany, have begun investing heavily in high-speed rail networks to provide viable alternatives to air travel. Meanwhile, destinations can promote eco-friendly tourism experiences, such as low-impact outdoor activities and stays at certified sustainable accommodations.


Awadh360 Plus


The tourism industry faces a major challenge in balancing economic benefits with environmental responsibility. While travel is a significant driver of global GDP and job creation, its unchecked carbon footprint is becoming increasingly unsustainable. The study by Dr. Sun and her team makes it clear that without stronger regulations, better emissions tracking, and a faster shift to renewable energy, tourism will continue to be a major contributor to climate change.


For destinations, this means making tough choices about how many visitors they can realistically accommodate without harming the environment. For airlines, it requires meaningful investments in cleaner technologies. And for travelers, it involves making more conscious decisions about how and where they travel. As more cities and countries begin implementing visitor fees and restrictions, the message is clear: sustainable tourism is no longer just an option—it is a necessity.